2014 (2) TMI 807

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... pt to get over the statutory requirement of pre-deposit. There is no documentary support to the plea of financial hardships - Conditional stay granted. - Appeal No. 3311 of 2012 - - - Dated:- 4-3-2013 - Mr. P.G. Chacko and Mr. B.S.V. Murthy, JJ. For the Appellant: Mr. P. Purushotham, Consultant For the Respondent: Shri R.K. Singla, Commissioner (AR) ORDER Per: P. G. Chacko; .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... oint Venture company (hereinafter referred to as JV). The submission of the learned counsel is that the design, etc. of the projects were undertaken by L T and the rest of the works undertaken by the other partner of the JV. The proceeds were shared by the members of the JV. On these facts, the appellant claims to have rendered no taxable service to the State Government. We have also heard the l .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nd Stay Order No. 903/2012 dated 23.5.2012 in appeal No. ST/3046/2011 [Sushee Infra Pvt. Ltd. 2012 (28) S.T.R. 53 (Tri.-Bang.)]. None of the cited stay orders is of any aid to the appellant inasmuch as they were rendered on facts substantially different from the facts of the instant case. One of the stay orders was passed in the appellants own earlier case but the same also is not helpful to the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X