TMI Blog2009 (11) TMI 822X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d counsel for the opposite parties. The petitioner is aggrieved with the order dated 12.10.2009 passed by the Trade Tax Tribunal, Lucknow, i.e. opposite party No.2, whereby the Tribunal has been pleased to passed an order staying only 90 % of the amount from recovery, whereas the petitioner being a Government Corporation seeks exemption to the extent of 100 % till disposal of the appeal. Mr. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... has been attached, which permitted for operation by the petitioner, till further order of this court. Since I have stayed the recovery proceeding, I hereby provide that the petitioner shall be permitted to operate the account. Since the appeal is still pending considering for adjudication before the appellate authority, no further action is required by this Court in the matter. With the afor ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|