9911796707
TMI Blog2014 (6) TMI 242X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... herefore, they are eligible to abatement under Notification No. 1/06-ST dated-1/3/2006. We find force in his argument that merely because that they would be eligible to avail credit in future, would not disentitle them from availing the abatement under Notification 1/06-ST dated 1/3/2006, where the condition is specific on the availment of CENVAT credit and not laid down to eligibility of CENVAT c ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... .1.19 Crores and equal amount of penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act. 2. At the outset, the Ld. Chartered Accountant for the applicant submits that during the relevant period i.e. from October, 2005 to April, 2008, they have discharged service tax on various taxable services including 'convention service'. In discharging service tax on the taxable value, received against ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tput service on convention service. His further submission is that even though necessary information's were submitted to the Department in March, 2010, the demand was issued on 20th April, 2011, therefore, the demand is barred by limitation. 3. Per contra, the Ld. A.R. for the Revenue has submitted that the adjudicating authority has observed that the applicant could avail the CENVAT credit ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n No. 1/06-ST dated-1/3/2006. We find force in his argument that merely because that they would be eligible to avail credit in future, would not disentitle them from availing the abatement under Notification 1/06-ST dated 1/3/2006, where the condition is specific on the availment of CENVAT credit and not laid down to eligibility of CENVAT credit in future. Regarding the demand for the period March ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
