TMI Blog2014 (7) TMI 668X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nd respondent ORDER (Delivered by R. Sudhakar,J.) The appeal is filed against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Chennai, dated 7.6.2013, dismissing the appeal filed by the appellant herein for non-compliance of the conditional order of stay granted by the Tribunal. 2.1. The brief facts of the case are as under: The appellant filed an appea ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nding the appeal. 2.3. Pursuant to the said order dated 23.1.2013 passed by the Tribunal, the appellant deposited only Rs. 20 Lakhs and filed an application seeking extension of time for complying the order dated 23.1.2013. The Tribunal, by order dated 21.3.2013, directed the appellant to deposit the balance amount of Rs. 1 Crore within a period of eight weeks from the date of the said order and ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ppeal is filed, the person filing the appeal should deposit before the adjudicating authority the duty demanded or the penalty levied, unless the same is dispensed with by the Tribunal. In case such deposit as contemplated under Section 35-F of the Central Excise Act is not deposited, the appeal is liable to be dismissed. 5. In the case on hand, we find that the Tribunal, after hearing the learne ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|