9911796707
TMI Blog2014 (7) TMI 828X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... al for condonation of delay is not enclosed therein. This attitude of the appellant would only go to show that the appellant is not serious in pursuing the matter and is only trying to drag on the proceedings - document, viz., the application for condonation of delay, is a very relevant document, which is very much required for adjudicating the present appeal, as the said document alone would show ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 3, passed by the 2nd respondent dated 1.8.13, wherein the following substantial questions of law have been raised :- i) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in dismissing the condonation of delay petition. ii) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the cdase, the Tribunal erred in not relying upon the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Katij ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... in it has been held that the Court should adopt a pragmatic approach and exercise their discretion on the facts of each case keeping in mind that in construing the expression sufficient course the principle of advancing substantial justice if of prime importance and expression sufficient cause should receive a liberal construction. 2. The primary issue raised by the appellant in this appeal is ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... is very much required for adjudicating the present appeal, as the said document alone would show the stand taken by the appellant before the Tribunal for condoning the delay. In the absence of the said vital document, the veracity of the stand taken by the appellant before this Court itself becomes questionable. The non-furnishing of the abovesaid document along with the typed set of papers would ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
