TMI Blog2014 (7) TMI 831X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... - X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ppearing for the Revenue in support of these Appeals, on the earlier occasion. We have also heard Mr.Sridharan, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Assessee. 4 Upon perusal of the order under challenge we find that entertaining the Appeals and keeping them pending would serve no purpose essentially because the finding of the Tribunal is that none of the manufacturers/ suppliers have claimed ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ndents/ Suppliers would file an affidavitcumundertaking that they would not claim any refund of duty which was paid by them. Accordingly, the matter was adjourned. The Respondents have filed the affidavitcumundertaking dated 30.06.2014 stating therein that they shall not claim the refund of duty which was paid by the Respondent at the factory at Bangalore and Kurkumbh (supplier factories) in respe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , then, all the more this is not a fit case for entertaining the Appeals. 7 In the light of the clear findings of fact and which stand supported by the statements made and the undertakings given to this Court that the Appeals are disposed of. They do not raise any substantial question of law. We clarify that the view taken by us is in the facts peculiar to the Assessee and shall not bind the Reve ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|