Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2014 (7) TMI 909

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The assessee - Islamic Academy of Education at Mangalore, has been granted exemption under Sections 11 and 12 of the Act. The trustees of the assessee - Trust were the directors of Yenepoya Institute of Medical Science Research Private Limited. The funds of the assessee Trust were invested in the said Yenepoya Institute of Medical Science Research Private Limited. The assessing officer held that the funds invested exceeds 5% of the capital and therefore, Section 13(4) of the Act is not applicable and accordingly, held that the income of the assessee is not exempted in view of Section 13(2)(h) of the Act. Aggrieved by the same, they preferred an appeal to the Commissioner of Income .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... sessee, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) held that the assessee is entitled to the benefit under Sections 11 and 12 of the Act. Aggrieved by the said order, the revenue preferred an appeal to the Tribunal. They contended that the capital of that concern mentioned in Section 13(4) of the Act means share capital of the company. It does not include the borrowed capital. If share capital is taken into consideration the amount of investment made by the trust in the said company exceeds 5% and therefore, they are not entitled for the benefit of exemption. The Tribunal after taking note of the various judgments has held that the capital of the concern cannot be restricted to only share capital. Therefore, the word 'Capital' include .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... stitution invested in a concern in which any person referred to in sub-section (3) has a substantial interest, does not exceed five per cent of the capital of that concern, the exemption under section 11 [or section 12] shall not be denied in relation to any income other than the income arising to the trust or the institution from such investment, by reason only that the [funds] of the trust or the institution have been invested in a concern in which such person has a substantial interest. 5. A reading of the aforesaid Section makes it clear that if the funds invested in a concern in which any person referred to in sub-Section (3) of Section 13 of the Act has substantial interest, does not exceed 5% of the capital of that concern, the exem .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hich can at any subsequent time can be distributed as dividend. The instant case is not a case under the Wealth Tax Act. 6. The expression used is 'Capital' of the concern. If the intention of the legislature was to restrict it to share capital, then they would have expressly stated so. In the absence of any such expression, before the word 'Capital' if we were to read 'Share', it amounts to Court's Legislating which is not permissible. Therefore, especially while granting the benefit to the charitable institution, when the legislature consciously provided for the funds of the said Trust by way of investment and they have fixed a limit of 5%, by placing an interpretation which is contrary to the expressed words, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates