9911796707
TMI Blog1979 (4) TMI 157X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ollector of Customs Central Excise, New Delhi by which personal penalty of ₹ 5,000 was imposed on the appellant among others as he has allegedly concerned with the recovery of contraband goods from the residential premises of one Shri S.P. Jain. The appellant has denied any connection with the seized goods and the appeal is only against the imposition of personal penalty. 2. The Board h ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... though Shri Jain tried to show that the said room was rented out to the appellant, there was no documents in shape of lease-deed or rent-deed to support Shri Jain s contention. The appellant himself has denied that he had anything to do with the seized goods or had kept them in the said premises or leased the premises. Therefore, the Board finds that there is no evidence on record to show that th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Jain and Shri S.C. Jain. In this connection, the Board observes that the appellant was an employee of M/s. Shaw Wallace Co. and in the course of his duties, had to book orders on behalf of his Company and the mention of the name of Shri S.C. Jain in his diary, though may raise some doubts about his connections with the other two accused, cannot point out to a firm conclusion that the appellant ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
