9911796707
TMI Blog2014 (8) TMI 430X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... riminal Complaint No.14089 of 2009 from the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Gurgaon, Haryana to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Bangalore. 2. The petitioner appears to have borrowed a loan of Rs. 15,00,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Lakh) for business purposes from the respondent-company. A cheque allegedly issued in partial repayment of the loan amount and drawn on the Syndicate Bank, C ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... stion was issued and dishonoured at Bangalore and the offence, if any, was committed only at Bangalore. Issue of statutory notices to the petitioners from Gurgaon also does not confer jurisdiction upon the Courts concerned or justify continuance of the proceedings at Gurgaon. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we are inclined to allow this petition. We say so because in para 7 of th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r law." 5. It is evident from the above that the only reason the complainant claims jurisdiction for the Courts at Gurgaon is the fact that the complainant-respondent had issued the statutory notices relating to the dishonour of the cheque from Gurgaon. We do not think that issue of a statutory notice can by itself confer jurisdiction upon the Court to take cognizance of an offence under Section ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s of the offence under Section 138 and cannot, therefore, confer jurisdiction upon the Court from where such acts are performed. Although the complaint does not claim jurisdiction for the Court at Gurgaon on the ground that the cheque was presented for collection there yet in the Counter affidavit, the respondent has tried to justify the filing of the complaint on that ground. Dashrath Rupsingh's ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
