9911796707
TMI Blog2014 (8) TMI 909X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Revenue against OIO No. KDL/Commr/09/09/10 dated 31.7.2009. 2. Despite notices, respondent did not turn-up nor has filed any adjournment application. 3. Since the matter is of 2009, we take up the appeal for disposal in the absence of any representation from the respondents. 4. Heard Departmental representative. 5. On considering the submissions made by the Ld Dept Representative and perusal ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... f Hon'ble CESTAT, Mumbai Appeal No. 1 Kandla Clearing Agency Pvt Ltd A/915 to 987/WZB/2004/C-1 dated 7.5.2004 C/1039/03 2 Shri Dev Kumar Kapta A/915 to 987/WZB/2004/C-1 dated 7.5.2004 C/1040/03 3 Shri Shantilal Jain A/915 to 987/WZB/2004/C-1 dated 7.5.2004 C/1041/03 4 Shri Rajkumar Mundhra A/915 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... mmissioner in the Denovo proceedings: a. Confirmation of duty demand against M/s Agro Canners to the tune of Rs. 1,94,70,583/- and imposition of penalty of Rs. 1,94,70,583/- and imposition of redemption fine of Rs. 70,00,000/-. b. Imposition of penalty of Rs. 15,00,000/- on Shri Ashwani Kumar More. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... l had been filed. 6. On perusal of the records, we do notice that this Bench had remanded the matter aback in respect of the appellants as indicated in original proceedings to adjudicating authority to reconsider the issue. It is also noticed that M/s Agro Canners never filed an appeal against the confirmation of demands of customs duty or against the amount of redemption fine imposed in the orig ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
