2011 (6) TMI 705

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r the Respondent. ORDER Appellant is in appeal against imposition of penalty of ₹ 1,15,933/- in the revision order passed by the Commissioner. 2. Learned consultant submitted that in this case appellants were not aware of their liability to pay Service Tax in respect of maintenance work undertaken by them for Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Ltd. As soon as they were inform .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... authority. Learned consultant relied upon the decision of the Tribunal in the case of SMP Steel Corporation v. CCE, Madurai - 2011 (22) S.T.R. 56 (Tri.-Chennai) to support his contention that when the appeal was pending, Commissioner could not have commenced revision proceedings. He also relies upon the decision of the Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan in the case of UOI v. Inani Carriers - 2009 (13 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... sidered in detail at a later stage and that DR will get an opportunity to explain why this notification could not be applied. In the meanwhile, taking note of the fact that relying on this notification, another assessee was granted unconditional stay and also decision of the Tribunal in the case of SMP Steel Corporation (supra) wherein a view was taken that revision proceedings cannot be started w .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X