2014 (10) TMI 244

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e gone into at the time of final hearing. Both sides have relied upon several judgments in support of their contentions. As an amount of ₹ 1,17,36,640/- has been already paid by the appellant, the same is considered to be sufficient deposit for the purpose of granting stay on the remaining amount till the disposal of this appeal - Stay granted. - Appeal No.ST/10662/2014 - ORDER No. M/13683/ .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ue that Contract Service provided to the above departments were under a composite contract which was subsequently bifurcated into supply contract and service contract for ease of operation. Appellant pay service tax under Works Contract (Composition Scheme for payment of Service Tax) Rule 2007. According to the Revenue the value of supply of goods was also required to be added to the value as per .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... bid obtained does not have separate values for supply of goods or services. It was his case that the entire contracts are on turn-key projects and cannot be vivisected into supply contract and service contract which has been done artificial by the appellant afterwards. It was also his case that breach of any condition of supply contract and service contract were depending upon each other and breac .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X