TMI Blog2014 (11) TMI 260X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er section 80P(2)(a)(i) of Income Tax Act, 1961 by adjudicating the assessee as cooperative bank by applying section 80P(4) instead of treating it as cooperative credit society." 2. The brief facts of the case for the assessment year 2010-11 are that the Assessee is a co-operative society registered under the Karnataka State Co-operative Societies Act. The Assessee filed return declaring gross total income of Rs. 11,62,750/- and claimed deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) and therefore net taxable income was shown to be "nil". The AO did not allow the deduction to the Assessee u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) and the income was assessed at Rs. 11,62,750/-. The AO while denying the deduction to the Assessee u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) took the view that the Assessee is a primary co-operative bank and therefore provisions of Sec.80P(4) are applicable in the case of the Assessee. The Assessee went in appeal before the CIT(A). CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the Assessee. 2.1 The ld. AR before us on the basis of written submissions vehemently contended that the provisions of Sec. 80P(4) are not applicable in the case of the Assessee. The main contentions of the assessee are that Assessee is not a co-operative bank. The ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... to 3/PNJ/2012 dt. 30.3.2012. Reliance was also placed on the decision of Panaji Bench in ITA No. 229 & 230/PNJ/2013 in the case of Tararani Mahila Co-operative Credit Society, vs ITO. Reliance was also placed in ACIT vs Palhawas Primary Agriculture Co-operative Society Ltd, 23 Taxman.com 318 (Delhi), ITO vs Jankalyan Nagri Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd, 24 Taxman.com 127 (Pune). Reliance was also placed on the decision of Karnataka High Court in the case of CIT vs Sri Biluru Gurubasava Pattana Sahakari Sangh Niyamitha dated 5.2.2014, which relates to an appeal filed against the order passed u/s 263 and the question involved was whether the Revisional Authority was justified in invoking his power u/s 263 without the foundational fact of the assessee being co-operative bank. 2.2 The ld. DR, on the other hand vehemently contended that the Assessee is a co-operative bank in view of the definition of the co-operative bank given under explanation to Sec. 80P(4) the Assessee is engaged in the business of banking. Sec. 80P(4) puts an embargo w.e.f. 1.4.2007 that if a co- operative society is carrying on banking business, the Assessee will not be entitled for the exemption. Reliance was placed ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e reading of Sec. 80P(4) it is apparent that this section denies deduction to a co-operative bank other than a primary agricultural credit society or primary co- operative agricultural and rural development bank. The provisions of Sec. 80P(4) was introduced in the statute by the Finance Act, 2006 w.e.f. 1.4.2007. The explanation to the section defines the co-operative bank and primary agricultural credit society to have the same meaning as assigned to them in Part- V of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. It is not the case of either of the parties that the Assessee is a primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank. It is also not the claim of the Assessee that Assessee is a primary agricultural credit society. If we read both the sections, Sec. 80P(2)(a)(i) and Sec. 80P(4) together, we find that the provisions of Sec. 80P(4) mandates that the provisions of Sec. 80P will not apply to any co-operative bank other than a primary agricultural credit society or primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank but as per the provisions of Sec. 80P(2)(a)(i), a co-operative society engaged in carrying on the business of banking or providing credit facilities to it ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nesses for the members. If the Assessee co-operative society carries on one or both of the activities, it will be eligible for deduction. These two activities are (a) co-operative society engaged in carrying on business of banking facilities to its members or (b) co-operative society engaged in providing credit facilities to its members. Both the activities can be carried on by the co-operative society for its members. If a co-operative society is engaged in carrying on these activities/facilities for the persons other than its members, the co-operative society, in our opinion, will not be eligible for deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) on the income which it derives from carrying on the activities not relating to its members. Therefore, where a co-operative society is engaged in carrying on business of banking facilities to its members and to the public or providing credit facilities to its members or to the public, the income which relates to the business of banking facilities to its members or providing credit facilities to its members will only be eligible for deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i). There is no prohibition u/s 80P not to allow deduction to such co- operative societies in respect o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r opinion, will not be applicable in the case of the Assessee. Once, the Assessee will not fall within the provisions of Sec. 80P(4), the Assessee, in our opinion, will be eligible to get deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) in respect of whole of the income which the Assessee derives from carrying on the business of banking or providing credit facilities to its members. 8. Whether condition no. 1 is applicable in the case of the Assessee, for this we have to look into the bye-laws of the Assessee. The objects of the Assessee in this case are enumerated as under :- "1) To fulfil the demands of merchants and industrialists, provide loans on commercial merchandise and provide loans on godowns warehouses. 2) To provide loans on products produced by merchants and industrialists, on by-products, on the basis of other goods and materials, sell such products, by- products, goods and materials as broker and provide loans for production of such merchandise. 3) To provide loans to meet individual necessities of merchants and industrialist. To provide loans on shares, debentures, National saving certificates, postal deposits, other Government securities, movable and immovable assets. 4) To collec ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ept the finding given by CIT(A). 9. The deposits so accepted are used by the Assessee co-operative society for lending or investment. Even out of the deposits so received, the loans have been given to the members of the society in accordance with the objects as enumerated above. Thus, in our opinion, condition no.1 does stand satisfied and it can be said that the Assessee society was carrying on banking business as it was accepting deposits from the persons who were not members during the impugned year. 10. The authorised representative took the plea that the assessee has not obtained banking licence. In our opinion it is not necessary that the co-operative society should have a banking licence as per the definition under the Income Tax Act for carrying on banking business. If licence is not obtained it may be an illegal banking business under the other statute. What we have to see whether the nature of the business carrying on by the assessee is a banking business or not. The Income Tax in our opinion is not concerned whether the banking business carried on by the assessee is legal or illegal. The income has to be assessed u/s 14 of the Income Tax Act under the same head even if ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... . This fact is clarified further by sub-section (2) as re- produced hereinabove that no co-operative society shall refuse admission to the membership, without sufficient reason, to any person who is qualified to become member under the provisions of this Act, rules and bye-laws. This clearly proves that in case the rules and bye-laws of the other co-operative society provides otherwise, the co-operative society may not be admitted as a member of the co-operative society. The person, as per sub-section (2), must be qualified for becoming member not only u/s 16(1) but also as per the rules and bye-laws of the co-operative society. We cannot read sub-section (2) in the manner that the rules and bye-laws cannot permit the admission of any other co- operative society as a member of the co-operative society. Had that been the intention of the legislature, they would have not used the words "this Act, rules and bye-laws" in sub-section (2). 13. We have gone through the bye-laws which contains the membership clause. bye-laws no.13 states as under :- "13. Membership: 1) "A" class membership shall include merchants, industrialists and individual merchants and industrialists who have the c ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 80P(2)(a)(i). We have also gone through the decision of the Bangalore Bench of the Tribunal in the case of ITO vs. Divyajyothi Credit Co-operative Society Ltd. (supra) in ITA No. 72/Bang/2013. In this case, we noted that the Hon'ble Tribunal confirmed the order of CIT(A) following the decision of the Tribunal in the case of ACIT, Circle 3(1), Bangalore vs. M/s. Bangalore Commercial Transport Credit Co-operative Society Ltd. in ITA No. 1069/Bang/2010 holding that Sec. 80P(2)(a)(i) is applicable only to credit co-operative society a and not to co-operative bank. With due regards to the Bench, we are unable to find any term "credit co- operative society" u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) or u/s 80P(4), therefore, this decision cannot assist us. We noted that the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of CIT vs. Jafari Momin Vikas Co-op. Credit Society Ltd. in Tax Appeals no. 442 of 2013, 443 of 2013 and 863 of 2013 (supra) vide order dt. 15.1.2014 took the view that Sec. 80P(4) will not apply to a society which is not a co-operative bank. In the case of Vyavasaya Seva Sahakara Sangha vs. State of Karnataka & Ors. (supra) we noted that the issue before the Hon'ble High Court in the Writ Pet ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ect or principal business of the assessee is banking business. Therefore, the assessee will not comply with the first condition as laid down in the definition as given u/s. 5(ccv) of the Banking Regulation act, 1959 for becoming "primary cooperative bank". The assessee, therefore, cannot be regarded to be primary cooperative bank and in consequence thereof, it cannot be a co-operative bank as defined under part V of the Banking Regulation Act 1949. Accordingly, in our opinion the provisions of section 80P (4) read with explanation there under will not be applicable in the case of the assessee. The assessee, therefore, in our opinion will be entitled for the deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i). We accordingly confirm the order of CIT(A) allowing deduction to the assessee." 15. We have also gone through the decision of ACIT vs Palhawas Primary Agriculture Co-operative Society Ltd, 23 Taxman.com 318 (Delhi). Section 80P(4) clearly excludes primary agriculture credit society from its domain. Therefore this decision will not assist the assessee. We have also gone through the decision of Pune Bench in the case of ITO vs Jankalyan Nagri Sahakari Pad Sanstha Ltd, 24 Taxman.com 127 Pune. This we ha ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|