2011 (9) TMI 893

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... cise Appeal No. 36 of 2011 filed by Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur-II against the CESTAT Final Order No. 141/2010, dated 11-3-2010 as reported in 2010 (254) E.L.T. 538 (Tri.-Del.) (Nirmal Products v Commissioner). While dismissing the appeal, the Hon ble High Court passed the following order : This is appeal by the Government of India under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... for want of any substantial question of law arising in the case. Before parting with the case, we are constrained to observe that the appellant has filed certified copy of the impugned order which contains several markings in it. To say the least, it is not permissible by any canon of rules. It is expected of the parties, be that appellant or respondent, to only file documents (pleadings), whic .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X