9911796707
TMI Blog2013 (2) TMI 647X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... MS. RITU BAHRI J.- C.M. No. 643-CII of 2012 There is a delay of 21 days in filing the present appeal. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 21 days in filing the appeal is condoned. C.M. disposed of. VATAP No. 2 of 2012 This appeal under section 36 of the Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003 is against the order dated March 25, 2011 in Appeal No. 396 passed by the Ha ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... his order was treated as sale without C forms and was taxed at 12.5 per cent. The orders passed by the Assessing Authority have been affirmed by the Joint Excise and Taxation Commissioner (Appeals), Rohtak, vide order dated July 2, 2010 (annexure A2) and by the Haryana Tax Tribunal vide order dated March 25, 2011 (annexure A3). Counsel for the appellant has referred F forms annexure A1 (coll ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... at if the documents were found to be fabricated then the Assessing Authority could saddle the dealer-assessee with penalty as per provision of the Act. Deepak Radios' case [2009] 23 VST 42 (P H) is a case dealing with the Punjab Value Added Tax Act. Applying the ratio of the above judgment to the facts of the present case, as the benefit of form F has been declined to the assessee for the r ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
