Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2012 (2) TMI 451

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... respondent, on November 11, 2011. Thereafter, the respondent shall consider the objections filed by the petitioner, if any, and pass appropriate orders thereon, on the merits and in accordance with law, with regard to the cancellation of the registration of the petitioner - Writ Petition No. 2172 of 2012 ,M.P. Nos. 1,2 of 2012 - - - Dated:- 7-2-2012 - JAICHANDREN M., J. For the Appellant : R. Umasuthan For the Respondent : S. Kanmani Annamalai, Government Advocate (T), ORDER :- M. JAICHANDREN J.- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent. 2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner, praying that this court may be pleased to .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hat the authority concerned cannot cancel, modify or amend any certificate of registration, except for good and sufficient reasons, and clause 15 of the said section, which states that such cancellation can be made only after the dealer concerned had been given an opportunity of being heard. Therefore, the impugned order passed by the respondent is liable to be set aside. 5. The learned Government Advocate, appearing on behalf of the respondent, had submitted that the cancellation of the registration of the petitioner had been done as it was found that such registration had been issued based on the false information given by the petitioner, relating to the rental agreement, in respect of the premises in which the petitioner is said to be .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... gu Sundareswarar Thirukoil, with regard to the lease agreement entered into with the temple. While so, the respondent had passed the impugned order cancelling the registration of the petitioner, retrospectively, without giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. As such, the impugned order of the respondent, dated January 13, 2012, is liable to be set aside. Hence, it is set aside. The petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent, on February 23, 2012, along with all the relevant documents to substantiate his claims, pursuant to the notice issued by the respondent, on November 11, 2011. Thereafter, the respondent shall consider the objections filed by the petitioner, if any, and pass appropriate orders thereon, on the mer .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates