9911796707
TMI Blog2015 (2) TMI 736X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 2013 in response to his RTI application dated 9-10-2013. His second appeal is dated 22-11-2013, diarised in the Commission on 22-11-2013 and received in the office of FAA on 25-11-2013 against the response of CPIO vide letter dated 8-11-2013 in response to his RTI application dated 9-10-2013 read with inspection note No. 559, dated 18-11-2013. Notice was issued for hearing on 11-12-2013 at 1430 hrs. when Nodal CPIO was not present. The Nodal CPIO was directed to be present during the hearing scheduled on 11-12-2013 at 1430 hrs. vide notice dated 26-11-2013. However, a note has been received from him informing that he would not be participating in the hearing. A reply to the note has been sent to Nodal CPIO separately. During the hearing on ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e set aside on this ground. (ii) That the information sought under item No. (A) was not provided. However, it was mentioned that response at para (E) in the reply of CPIO dated 8-11-2013 will take care of his request. Under item (A), specific information viz. copy of relevant order/note sheets were called for while vide his reply dated 8-11-2013, the CPIO merely offered to inspect the file mentioned in item (E) of the RTI application. (iii) The CPIO has refused to disclose the information contained at pages 18-19 of the file mentioned at item (E) stating that it contains his personal information, disclosure of which has no relationship to any public activity. The grounds or reasons and the type of documents o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... benefit of inspection promptly. (vii) That note sheets 18 & 19 of File No. 2/3/2012/CIC/Adm. deals with grant of Earned Leave to Shri Pankaj KP Shreyaskar, Director-cum-Joint Registrar from 13-2-2013 to 18-2-2013 and 13-6-2013 to 17-6-2013 to avail LTC. Sl. No. 19 of the note sheet is regarding sending a copy of the 'No objection Certificate' to Shri Pankaj KP Shreyaskar by MoS(PI), Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MOSPI) for pursuing his Ph.D on part time basis. 6. The Nodal CPIO stated that he did not want to furnish any parawise comments on the appeal submitted by the appellant and that the exemption under Section 8(1)(j) has been correctly applied in this case. 7. In my opinion, when there w ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... routine matters of Administration in the functioning of the Government including the Commission. Pages 45 to 57 of the correspondence portion is the APAR of Shri Shreyaskar and protected from disclosure under Section 8(1)(j) being personal information, disclosure of which has no public interest. Correspondence at pages 28 & 29 relates to property return of Shri Shreyaskar which is also protected under Section 8(1)(j). However, as mentioned by the Nodal CPIO in his letter dated 20-11-2013, the information is already available on the website of the MoSPI. Note sheet at page 23 is regarding intimation of property transaction of Shri Shreyaskar which is again protected under section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act. In the light of the above position, Shri ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
