9911796707
TMI Blog2015 (2) TMI 962X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rvices the amount in dispute is ₹ 13352/-. On a query from the Bench as to whether the appellant has collected from the employees towards catering services, the learned advocate submitted that this aspect was not part of the SCN. However, he submits that he will file the supporting documents at the time of hearing the appeal to establish if any charges are reimbursed towards catering service ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... esh, Adv. For the Respondent : Mr P Arul, Superintendent (AR) ORDER Per: R Periasami: 1. Both stay applications are arising out of a common impugned Order-in-Appeal and therefore they are taken up together for disposal. 2. The adjudicating authority denied cenvat credit on Outdoor Catering Services and Clearing Forwarding services. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the adjudi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Bell Ceramics Ltd. - 2012 (25) STR 428 (Kar.) and pleaded for waiver of predeposit. 4. On the other hand, Ld. AR reiterates the findings of the impugned order. He submits that as per the amended provisions, the total amount is below ₹ 2 lakhs in both the cases and requested for dismissal of appeal on the monetary threshold limit. On merits, he submits that on outdoor catering services, t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 1,86,466 and in respect of C F services the amount in dispute is ₹ 13352/-. On a query from the Bench as to whether the appellant has collected from the employees towards catering services, the learned advocate submitted that this aspect was not part of the SCN. However, he submits that he will file the supporting documents at the time of hearing the appeal to establish if any charges are r ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
