2015 (3) TMI 77

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... al in the case of M/s Haldiram India Pvt. Ltd. & Others [2014 (10) TMI 724 - CESTAT NEW DELHI (LB)]. The larger bench held that if the delay in disposal of the appeal is not on account of any commission or omission on the part of the appellant and where the Tribunal is satisfied that the appellant was ready and willing for disposal of the appeal and/or had not indulged in any protractive strategie .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n of stay beyond the period of 365 days. The issue relating to competency of this Tribunal to extend the stay beyond 365 days was examined by the larger bench of this Tribunal in the case of M/s Haldiram India Pvt. Ltd. Others. The larger bench held that if the delay in disposal of the appeal is not on account of any commission or omission on the part of the appellant and where the Tribunal is s .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X