9911796707
TMI Blog2015 (3) TMI 984X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ents : Mr. Pramod Kumar Chopda ORDER The petitioner has come forward with the above writ petition to quash the proceedings dated 11.9.2014 and the demand notice dated 10.9.2014 passed by the respondents. 2. The petitioner is a non-resident Indian working in Singapore. The petitioner was directed to file income tax return for the year 1995-96. He filed return declaring nil income. On receipt of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 10, directed the petitioner to make fresh application for waiver. Pursuant to the same, the petitioner made a representation dated 28.12.2011. Since the same was also not considered, the petitioner filed another writ petition in WP.No.7319 of 2012 and this Court, by order dated 27.3.2012 directed the respondents therein to consider and dispose of the representation dated 25.12.2010 and 28.12.2011. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... om the tax amount, which is due from 1994 1995. But, the petitioner failed to avail the opportunity given by the authority. The learned counsel further submitted that after considering the case of the petitioner as per the direction of this Court, the impugned order has been passed and, therefore, no indulgence should be shown to the petitioner. Thus, the learned counsel prays for dism ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... titioner is directed to appear before the authority concerned on 01.5.2015 along with objections and documents, if any, without waiting for any fresh notice from the respondents and on such appearance, the authority concerned shall consider the objections raised and the documents to be produced by the petitioner and pass fresh orders in accordance with law. The petitioner shall deposits the entire ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
