9911796707
TMI Blog2015 (4) TMI 5X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... CIT(A) dated 19.12.2012. The grounds of appeal taken by assessee are reproduced below: 1. The order of Ld. CIT(A), New Delhi dated 19.12.2012 is bad in law and on facts. 2. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in confirming the disallowance a sum of ₹ 60,09,848/- under provisions of section 14A r.w. rule-8D of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 on dividend income of ₹ 9,12,563/- claimed exempt u/s 10(34) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. At the outset, Ld. A.R. submitted that A.O. had made disallowance of ₹ 60,09,848/- against dividend income of ₹ 9,12,563/-. He submitted that there was no satisfaction recorded by A.O. and in this respect, the provisions of Section 14A were read. Ld. A.R. submitted that the case of the assessee is fully covered by the order of Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT Vs Taikisha Engineering India Ltd. 54 Taxman.com 109 and filed a copy of the same. Ld. A.R. invited our attention to para 4 of the said order to highlight the facts of that case. Ld. A.R. also took us to para 10 of the said order and submitted that in the present case also, the A.O. has not recorded his object ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nses were incurred, he proceeded to make disallowance as per the provisions of Rule 8D. We find that Delhi Hon'ble High Court in the case of CIT Vs Taikisha Engineering India Ltd. under similar facts and circumstances, has decided the issue in favour of assessee by holding as under: 10. Having heard the Counsel for the parties, we feel that the respondent assessee is entitled to succeed on somewhat different grounds and reasons, than those elucidated by the Tribunal. 11. Section 14A of the Act is relevant and reproduced below:- ―14A. (1) For the purposes of computing the total income under this Chapter, no deduction shall be allowed in respect of expenditure incurred by the assessee in relation to income which does not form part of the total income under this Act. (2) The Assessing Officer shall determine the amount of expenditure incurred in relation to such income which does not form part of the total income under this Act in accordance with such method as may be prescribed, if the Assessing Officer, having regard to the accounts of the assessee, is not satisfied with the correctness of the claim of the assessee in respect of such expenditure in relation to inc ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the accounts of the assessee of a previous year, is not satisfied with- (a) the correctness of the claim of expenditure made by the assessee; or (b) the claim made by the assessee that no expenditure has been incurred, in relation to income which does not form part of the total income under the Act for such previous year, he shall determine the amount of expenditure in relation to such income in accordance with the provisions of sub-rule (2). (2) The expenditure in relation to income which does not form part of the total income shall be the aggregate of following amounts, namely:- (i) the amount of expenditure directly relating to income which does not form part of total income; (ii) in a case where the assessee has incurred expenditure by way of interest during the previous year which is not directly attributable to any particular income or receipt, an amount computed in accordance with the following formula, namely :- A B/C Where A = amount of expenditure by way of interest other than the amount of interest included in clause (i) incurred during the previous year ; B = the average of value of investment, income from which does not or shall not form part of the total income, as ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ully, we would find that the Assessing Officer is required to determine the amount of such expenditure only if the Assessing Officer, having regard to the accounts of the assessee, is not satisfied with the correctness of the claim of the assessee in respect of such expenditure in relation to income which does not form part of the total income under the said Act. In other words, the requirement of the Assessing Officer embarking upon a determination of the amount of expenditure incurred in relation to exempt income would be triggered only if the Assessing Officer returns a finding that he is not satisfied with the correctness of the claim of the assessee in respect of such expenditure. Therefore, the condition precedent for the Assessing Officer entering upon a determination of the amount of the expenditure incurred in relation to exempt income is that the Assessing Officer must record that he is not satisfied with the correctness of the claim of the assessee in respect of such expenditure. Sub-section (3) is nothing but an offshoot of sub-section (2) of Section 14A. Sub-section (3) applies to cases where the assessee claims that no expenditure has been incurred in relation to inco ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ve that Rule 8D(1) places the provisions of Section 14A(2) and (3) in the correct perspective. As we have already seen, while discussing the provisions of Subsections (2) and (3) of Section 14A, the condition precedent for the Assessing Officer to himself determine the amount of expenditure is that he must record his dissatisfaction with the correctness of the claim of expenditure made by the assessee or with the correctness of the claim made by the assessee that no expenditure has been incurred. It is only when this condition precedent is satisfied that the Assessing Officer is required to determine the amount of expenditure in relation to income not includable in total income in the manner indicated in sub-rule (2) of Rule 8D of the said Rules. It is, therefore, clear that determination of the amount of expenditure in relation to exempt income under Rule 8D would only come into play when the Assessing Officer rejects the claim of the assessee in this regard. If one examines sub-rule (2) of Rule 8D, we find that the method for determining the expenditure in relation to exempt income has three components. The first component being the amount of expenditure directly relating to i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of the Assessing Officer to determine the expenditure incurred in relation to such income which does not form part of the total income, in accordance with the prescribed method, arises if the Assessing Officer is not satisfied with the correctness of the claim of the assessee in respect of the expenditure which the assessee claims to have incurred in relation to income which does not part of the total income. Moreover, the satisfaction of the Assessing Officer has to be arrived at, having regard to the accounts of the assessee. Hence, sub-section (2) does not ipso facto enable the Assessing Officer to apply the method prescribed by the rules straightaway without considering whether the claim made by the assessee in respect of the expenditure incurred in relation to income which does not form part of the total income is correct. The Assessing Officer must, in the first instance, determine whether the claim of the assessee in that regard is correct and the determination must be made having regard to the accounts of the assessee. The satisfaction of the Assessing Officer must be arrived at on an objective basis. It is only when the Assessing Officer is not satisfied with the claim of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n regard to the correctness of the claim of the assessee, having regard to the accounts of the assessee. When a statute postulates the satisfaction of the Assessing Officer Courts will not readily defer to the conclusiveness of an executive authority's opinion as to the existence of a matter of law or fact upon which the validity of the exercise of the power is predicated . (M. A. Rasheed v. State of Kerala [1974] AIR 1974 SC 2249*). A decision by the Assessing Officer has to be arrived at in good faith on relevant considerations. The Assessing Officer must furnish to the assessee a reasonable opportunity to show cause on the correctness of the claim made by him. In the event that the Assessing Officer is not satisfied with the correctness of the claim made by the assessee, he must record reasons for his conclusion. These safeguards which are implicit in the requirements of fairness and fair procedure under article 14 must be observed by the Assessing Officer when he arrives at his satisfaction under sub-section (2) of section 14A. As we shall note shortly hereafter, sub-rule (1) of rule 8D has also incorporated the essential requirements of sub-section (2) of section 14A befo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the aggregate of the amount under clause (i), clause (ii) and clause (iii). Clause (i) relates to direct expenditure relating to income forming part of the total income and under clause (iii) an amount equal to 0.5% of the average amount of value of investment, appearing in the balance sheet on the first day and the last day of the assessee has to be disallowed. 20. However, in the present case we need not refer to sub Rule (2) to Rule 8D of the Rules as conditions mentioned in sub Section (2) to Section 14A of the Act read with sub Rule (1) to Rule 8D of the Rules were not satisfied and the Assessing Officer erred in invoking sub Rule (2), without elucidating and explaining why the voluntary disallowance made by the assessee was unreasonable and unsatisfactory. We do not find any such satisfaction recorded in the present case by the Assessing Officer, before he invoked sub Rule (2) to Rule 8D of the Rules and made the re-computation. Therefore, the respondent assessee would succeed and the appeal should be dismissed. 5. We find that Hon ble Delhi High Court has held that sub-rule 2 of Rule 8D cannot be invoked without recording explanation by A.O. as to why voluntary dis ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
