9911796707
TMI Blog2015 (4) TMI 939X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e been issued from time to time by the CBDT to its Officers (Circular No. 14(XL-35) dated 11.4.1955 and letter No. F.81/27/65-IT(B) dated 18.5.1965). If due to ignorance a wrong section has been mentioned by the assessee, it is the duty of the Assessing Officer to advise the assessee about the correct claim and also to assess the tax legitimately. This is the clear intention of the legislature. Without adverting further, we deem it appropriate to remand this file to the file of the learned Assessing Officer to examine the claim of the assessee afresh under provisions of section 54F of the Act, after providing due opportunity of being heard to the assessee. The assessee is also at liberty to furnish evidence, if any, to substantiate his c ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tion 54/54F are applicable and further erred in holding that exemption of ₹ 15,56,056/- (Rs.17,50,000/- (-) ₹ 1,93,944/-) claimed u/s 54 was not allowable to the assessee. 2. During hearing we have heard Shri S.S. Sheetal, learned counsel for the assessee, and Shri R.A. Verma, learned Senior DR. The crux of arguments on behalf of the assessee is that both the ground are inter-connected and the facts have not been appreciated in proper perspective by the Assessing Officer/CIT(A). It was also pleaded that the exemption claimed was in the fixed format of the Department and the later communication addressed to the authorities was not considered. Our attention was invited to page 16 of the paper book along with the administrative ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... se. The Assessing Officer, from the copy of registry, found that the market value considered by the Sub-Registrar is ₹ 26,97,000/-. The Assessing Officer opined that there is a difference of ₹ 8,97,000/- between the market value and the amount declared by the assessee for working out the capital gain. As per the Revenue, no specific explanation was given by the assessee. The assessee claimed exemption of capital gains by mentioning section 54B/54D/54G. The main plea of the Revenue is that correct section for claiming exemption for capital gains was not mentioned in the return. However, the plea of the assessee is that since it was a fixed format, the assessee was not wise enough to amend the same and also for the wrong doing of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tax legitimately. This is the clear intention of the legislature. It is pertinent to mention here that even the profit arising out of commercial assets held for more than 3 years can be claimed u/s 54F by utilising the same for acquisition/construction of residential house because the language used in sub-section (1) of section 54F is capital gain from the transfer of any long term capital asset which may be residential as well as commercial. The only requirement is investment within the specified time in a residential house (new asset) subject to certain conditions which are enumerated in the section itself. Even in sub-section (2) the language used is original asset meaning thereby no differentiation has been made between the residen ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
