9911796707
TMI Blog1988 (8) TMI 417X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ent. In January 1986, the State Government of Maharashtra gave senior time scale to his juniors while denying the same to him. The appellant moved the High Court of Bombay for relief with writ petition No. 656 of 1986. Upon Constitution of the Central Administrative Tribunal, the writ petition stood transferred to the Tribunal. The Tribunal by its order dated January 19, 1987 dismissed the petitio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ppellant had received the government letter containing confidential remarks. Yet the Tribunal proceeded on the basis that there was nothing wrong in relying upon that confidential report to deny benefit to the appellant. Indeed, the conclusion of the tribunal is very curious. It is a settled principle that an uncommunicated adverse report should not form the foundation to deny benefits to a Govern ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nicated under the first letter obviously does not indicate anything against the appellant. It reads as follows: He is serious, intelligent and a quiet type of officer and that he took interest in group discussions. It however states that the appellant would not freely mix with his fellow probationers and he had a marked inferiority complex which had on occasion led to some problems. We do no ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
