2015 (6) TMI 266

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nst Ext.P7 order, on the ground that it has been passed in violation of the rules of natural justice, cannot be entertained. Thus, without making any observations as regards the merits of the petitioner's case, I relegate the petitioner to the alternate remedy of filing an appeal against Ext.P7 order of the 1st respondent before the appellate authority under the KVAT Act. - Decided against assesse .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e learned Government Pleader for the respondents as well. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made across the bar, I find that this is a case where the assessment order originally passed against the petitioner for the same assessment year, was carried in appeal by the appellant, before the first appellate authority. The first appellate authority has .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... der, the petitioner did not file his objections, within the period granted by the appellate authority. Instead, the petitioner appears to have submitted Ext.P4 representation before the assessing authority seeking further period of one month from 06.02.2015, for producing the relevant objections. When nothing was done by the petitioner even after that, the assessing authority proceeded to pass Ext .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X