Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2015 (6) TMI 471

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n itself is taken up for final disposal. 2. The petitioner is a Partnership firm engaged in providing services under the category of Customs House Agent's Services. The Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise issued a show cause notice, dated 4-12-2009, demanding Service Tax of Rs. 1,39,097/-. The petitioner submitted its reply, on 4-3-2011 and the same was rejected by the third respondent/the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e was given by the Adjudicating Officer and subsequently, transferred to the Commissioner's office. The second respondent/appellate authority rejected the appeal only on the ground that the appeal was not received in time. Whereas, as per the seal obtained from the office of the adjudicating officer, the appeal is presented in time. Under normal circumstances, the adjudicating officer would have a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rder is liable to be set aside. 5. The learned counsel for the respondents admitted the fact that the appeal was received in time by the adjudicating officer, however, submitted that the second respondent noticing that the appeal was not received in time in his office, has rejected the same. 6. Admittedly, the appeal has been preferred in time and in fact, it has reached two different .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he petitioner filed the appeal before the Department though the same has been addressed to the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals-II). We may not lose sight of the fact that the appeal was filed as far back as on 14-7-1993 and for one reason or the other the same was not disposed of. Assuming that the appeal filed by the petitioner was addressed to a wrong officer nothing prevented the Dep .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... y the petitioner under the KVSS on merits." 8. In the light of the above, the appeal has to be heard by the second respondent/appellate authority. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the second respondent (appellate authority) is directed to entertain the appeal and after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, pass appropriate orders on merits and m accordance wi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates