Assessing Officer's Expense Disallowance Lacks Evidence; CIT(A) Rightly Rejects Arbitrary 5% Cut u/s 40A(2)(b).

There should be some evidence on the basis of which the action of the AO can be held to be justified to show that the expenses are unreasonable or excessive u/s 40A(2)(b). In the absence of any such evidence, an adhoc disallowance of 5% has rightly been rejected by the CIT(A) - AT .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X