2015 (7) TMI 253

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... This tax appeal has been filed by Revenue challenging the order of the Tribunal and this Court had admitted the appeal on the following question of law.  " Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in law in reversing the order of CIT(A) and thereby deleting the addition made on account of deemed dividend u/s.2(22)(e) of the Act on interco .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... er by his order dated 30th September 2004 rejected the claim of the assessee and treated the deposits as loan and consequently deemed to be a deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Act and accordingly computed the tax. The assessee filed appeal which was dismissed by CIT(A) on 11th May 2006. The assessee filed Second Appeal which has been allowed by the Tribunal on 5th June 2009 and the Tri .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... areholder in Amigo Brushes Pvt. Ltd. and therefore, the deposit received by the assessee of Rs. 25 lacs from Amigo Brushes Pvt Ltd. was an intercorporate deposit and not a deemed dividend and, therefore, though this aspect has not been considered by the Tribunal but since the order of the Tribunal can be supported by another legal reason on the admitted facts, we need not send the matter back. 3. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X