2015 (7) TMI 428

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... mpugned? Whether the learned Tribunal not erred in not holding that the Banquet Hall of the appellant would be covered under the definition of Mandap Keeper and chargeable to Service Tax and whereas the supply/sale of food would be an incident of sale and accordingly covered under Article 366(29A) of the Constitution of India? Whether the learned Tribunal not committed an error of jurisdicti .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... on in the judgment impugned? 2. Whether the learned Tribunal not erred in not holding that the Banquet Hall of the appellant would be covered under the definition of Mandap Keeper and chargeable to Service Tax and whereas the supply/sale of food would be an incident of sale and accordingly covered under Article 366(29A) of the Constitution of India? 3. Whether the learned Tribunal not commit .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X