2015 (9) TMI 78

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... was dismissed on 17 April 2007 while the advocate representing the revenue in this case was removed from the panel in June 2008. Thus there is no explanation for the period of more than 1 Year and 2 Months from the date of the dismissal of the appeal and removal of the advocate. It does not state the date on which the deponent of the affidavit came to know of the order of this Court dated 17 April .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... T) No. 725 of 2006 - - - Dated:- 21-8-2015 - M. S. Sanklecha And G. S. Kulkarni, JJ. For the Appellant : Mr. Suresh Kumar, Adv I/b Shyam Walve For the Respondent : Mr. Sanjiv M Shah, Adv ORDER P. C. This notice of motion has been taken out to restore the appeal which has been dismissed on 17 April 2007 under Rule 986 of the High Court (Original Side) Rules and for that purp .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Year and 2 Months from the date of the dismissal of the appeal and removal of the advocate. It does not state the date on which the deponent of the affidavit came to know of the order of this Court dated 17 April 2007 dismissing it's appeal. The aforesaid date would be the primary date around which would revolve the application for condonation of delay and consideration of the reasons for the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X