2007 (1) TMI 561

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ice Tax Appellate Tribunal (LB) was correct in rejecting the Application for Rectification of Mistakes on the grounds of non-maintainability alone because the order dated 20th September, 2005 was a referral order and not a final order although judgment rendered per incurium is not binding? (b) Whether learned CESTAT (LB) was right in not rectifying the apparent mistakes which were brough .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nally, whether the order dated 20th September, 2005 passed by CESTAT (LB) does or does not fall within the purview of Sub-Section (1) of the Section 129B of the Customs Act, 1962? And whether the LB was right in their decision of rejecting the application for Rectification of Mistakes filed by the department, under the legal provisions of Sub-Section (2) of the Section 129B of the Customs Act, 196 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X