2009 (2) TMI 811

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... NAN AKIL KURESHI , JJ. For The Appellant : MR RJ OZA For The Respondent: MR DAKSHESH MEHTA JUDGMENT : Heard learned counsel for either side. The following substantial question of law arises for our consideration. Is the Tribunal correct in dropping the demand of duty and interest, and reducing the penalty from ₹ 5,56,138 to ₹ 40,000/. The matter requires to .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X