TMI Blog2006 (1) TMI 29X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... or categorizing them as "consulting engineer": (a) Receiving enquiries from clients for design engineering supply of equipments, erection and commissioning of fire-fighting system based on which offers are supplied. (b) Receiving work orders for fire fighting system in 2 parts (a) for engineering and supply of equipment and (b) for erection and commissioning of the same. (c) Preparation of a detailed engineering drawing for fire fighting system. (d) Procurement of equipments as mentioned in the work order and their delivery to the site. (e) Erection of the system at the client's site for which mobilization of manpower by appointing sub-contractors. (f) Test/commissioning/training the client's personnel on handling the system. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... under clause 13 of Section 65. Even with reference to the CBEC Circular F No. B/43/5/97-TRU dated 2.7.97, they cannot be termed as an engineering consultant." 5. Being aggrieved with the Order-in-Appeal, the Revenue has filed the present appeal. The ld. SDR elaborates on the definition of the "Consulting Engineer's Service", which reads as follows:- "Consulting engineer" means any professionally qualified engineer or an engineering firm who, either directly or indirectly, render any advice, consultancy or technical assistance in any manner to a client in one or more disciplines of engineering." From the above definition, it is clear that any of the three activities, namely, 'advice', 'consultancy' or 'technical assistance', has to be ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... p firms and that incorporated companies are excluded, not acceptable - As per Section 68 (1), which related to collection and recovery of service tax, the levy falls on 'every person' providing the service which expression includes natural persons as well as juristic persons - Tax being on the service provided, the Act made no distinction between different categories of service providers, be they individuals, partnership concerns or incorporated companies - Making any such classification would create and perpetuate anomalies - Petition fails." He also refers to the Board's Circular dated 18.12.2002 [reported in 2002 (53) RLT M145]: "Whether erection commissioning charges" are liable to service tax, or not. This matter has also been ex ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|