9911796707
TMI Blog2015 (10) TMI 444X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... mdar, Adv., M/s Gagrat & Co. For the Respondent : Mr. K. Radhakrishnan, Sr. Adv., Ms. Aruna Gupta, Adv., Mr. Arijit Prasad, Adv., Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Adv. ORDER The appellant-assessee herein is engaged in printing of PVC films/ sheets at its factory located in Daman. The appellant has classified its goods under Chapter Heading 4901 of the Schedule to Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, and w ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... under Chapter Heading 4901 and instead appropriate classification was 3926.90. On that basis, differential duty was demanded and interest and penalty were also proposed. The appellant filed its reply stating the facts mentioned above, submitting that the goods were rightly classified under Chapter 4901. The contention of the appellant was not accepted resulting into passing of Order-in-Original d ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... PVC films/ sheets as motif and pictorial representation falling under Chapter 49 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, in order to mislead the department and taken undue advantage of Section Note 2 of Section VII of the said Act. The appellant had challenged the Order-in-Original before the CESTAT, also on the ground that it was barred by limitation. The CESTAT has, however, not gone into those issu ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Notice was even dropped. Therefore, under the aforesaid circumstances, by no stretch of imagination, the appellant can be treated as a person who had misled the authorities or made any mis-statement / mis-declaration. The appeal is allowed on this ground itself without going into the issue of classification setting aside the impugned order. As a result, the impugned orders passed by the authoriti ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
