2015 (10) TMI 702

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... artment in this Court, which is not maintainable - Decided against Revenue. - CRR No.339 of 1994 - - - Dated:- 13-1-2015 - Mr. Jitendra Chauhan, J. For the Petitioner : Mr. D.D. Sharma, Advocate For the Respondent : None JITENDRA CHAUHAN J. (Oral) 1. As per the office report, summons issued to the respondents received back unserved with the report that the Mill has been l .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tral Excise, Chandigarh, that the accused No.1 of which accused No.2 and 3 are partners had evaded Central Excise Duty on the goods found short and/or on processed man made fabrics which are alleged to have been removed clandestinely on private bills/records and that order achieves finality, the revenue would be entitled to file fresh complaint against the accused on the same facts and ground in a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nds that as the impugned order dated 24.04.1992, is in favour of the department giving liberty to file fresh complaint, so at this stage, he has not grouse against the order of Sessions Judge, Amritsar and could not possibly assail it on any ground, at this stage. 6. This Court has gone through the impugned judgment of the First Revisional Court and finds no infirmity in the same. This is the s .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X