2015 (10) TMI 896

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d Representative) ORDER Per : Mr. P.K. Das; The applicant filed this miscellaneous application for extension of period of stay vide Stay Order No. S/1958/WZB/AHD/2012 Dated 06/09/2012. 2. The Larger Bench of the Tribunal in the case of M/s Haldiram India Pvt.Ltd. & others Vs Commissioner, Central Excise & Service Tax - 2014-TIOL-1965-CESTAT-DEL-LB, held that the Stay Order passed by the Tribun .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ulged in any protractive strategies, extension of stay could be granted (beyond the period of 365 days) by passing a speaking order disclosing the satisfaction of the Tribunal as to absence of any delay/protractive stratagems by the appellant/assessee resulting in non disposal of the appeal or that the appeal could not be disposed of on account of pendency of several appeals or other reasons attri .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tructure and organizational limitations of CESTAT. 21. The reference is answered as above. All the present applications/ appeals shall be listed before the appropriate Bench having the roster, for disposal on merits. 3. None appeared on behalf of the applicant. 4. On the other hand, the Learned Authorised Representative for the Revenue submits that the appellant has not taken necessary steps fo .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X