9911796707
TMI Blog2015 (10) TMI 1239X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nd Jha, Authorised Representative Per: H.K. Thakur These appeals have been filed by the appellant with respect to O.I.A. No. 119 to 120/2012(Ahmd-I) CE/AK/Commr(A)/Ahd Dated 08.11.2012 under which O.I.O No. MP/02/DEM/AC/2012 Dated 21.05.2012 has been upheld. Under O.I.O Dated 21.05.2012 a penalty of Rs. 84,290/- was imposed upon the main appellant M/s. Nitdip Textile Processors Pvt. Ltd. and a p ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... on to evade payment of duty and imposition of penalty upon the Director. That the entire duty, alongwith interest, was paid much before the issue of Show Cause Notice. 3. Shri Govind Jha, (AR) appearing on behalf of the Revenue argued that penalty upon the Director of the main appellant has been correctly imposed and accordingly, defended the orders passed by the first appellate authority. 4. He ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... learly admitted that the clearances were made without issuing of Central Excise invoices and without discharging appropriate duty and that all those activities were done under his knowledge. Hence penalty was correctly imposed however, looking to the facts and circumstances of the case a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- upon the Director of the main appellant will justify the ends of Justice. Accordingly, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
