2015 (10) TMI 1254

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Respondent : Shri Sumit Kumar Khabya, Consultant        ORDER Per Ashok Jindal: Revenue is in appeal against the impugned order wherein Ld. Commissioner (A) has allowed Cenvat Credit on MS Angle, Channel, Beams Pipes, Joints etc. after verifying the records. Respondent has also filed a cross objection. 2. The facts of the case are that during the period October 2 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t Credit was denied. Consequently, demand of duty was confirmed along with interest. Penalty was also imposed. The said order was challenged by the respondent before the Ld. Commissioner (A) for the amount of Rs. 12,40,024/-. On appeal Ld. Commissioner (A) examined the records and verified the facts of the case and allowed Cenvat Credit of Rs. 12,40,024/-. Aggrieved from the said order Revenue is .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X