Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2015 (10) TMI 1861

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... re. Accordingly, they are dismissed as not pressed. In connection with first ground, the ld. Counsel for the assessee mentioned that there are a couple of limbs in this ground and the same is extracted as under: "The Commissioner of Income-tax(Appeals) erred both in law and on the facts of the case, (i) in not directing the Assessing Officer to calculate the depreciation on the basis of written down value as on 31.3.1994, and (ii) in not setting off of the loss carried forward from assessment year 1994-95." 3. Giving background of this appeal, the ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that it is second round of the proceedings before the Tribunal. In the first round, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the assessee in I.T.A.No. 1867/Md .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... as 16, 17 and 19 of the binding judgment of the Hon'ble High Court (supra) and submitted that the findings of the Tribunal in the first round on both the issues stand set aside and the issues are remanded back to the Tribunal for fresh consideration. Further, referring to para 16, the ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that on the given facts of the assessee, the written down value for the assessment year 1994-95 remains the written down value for the assessment year 1995-96 also if there is a valid claim in the valid return, and, therefore, the same has to be taken into consideration in working out the depreciation for the assessment year 1996-97. Further, on the second limb of the ground relating to setting off of the brought forw .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the calculation, we do not think that there should be any impediment for the assessee in knocking at the doors of the Appellate Authority for reworking the assessment and no exception hence could be taken to the conduct of the assessee in filing such an appeal for the relief to arrive at correct tax liability. Eve in the worst scenario, even when the assessee conceded to the addition, it is always open to the assessee to go before the Appellate Authority to challenge the assessment on that particular addition. In fact a reading of section 246 shows that any assessee aggrieved by any of the enumerated orders of the Assessing Authority may appeal to the Appellate Authority against such order. Going by the scope of appeal thus prescribed in t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates