2015 (11) TMI 719

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... harma, AR, for the Respondent. ORDER The application is for recalling of the Final Order Nos. 55528-55529/2013 dated 6-2-2013 vide which the appeals filed by the appellant were rejected by upholding the order of Commissioner (Appeals). The appellate authority had dismissed the appeal on the point of limitation by observing that inasmuch as the appeals were filed beyond the condonable period of 3 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... has to be treated as an excise appeal. As such his submission that there is no merits in the appellant submissions. We agree with the learned DR. We have seen the order passed by the original adjudicating authority vide which he Is denying the Cenvat credit to the appellant in terms of Rule 14 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 read with Section 11A of the Central Excise Act 1944. Admittedly the appell .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X