2011 (8) TMI 1120

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... dents: Mr. Kiran Babu, Advocate. O R D E R Heard Mr. S. Ganesh, learned senior counsel along with Mr. Satyen Sethi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Kiran Babu, learned counsel for the Revenue. 2. Invoking jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for issue of a writ of certiorari for quashment of the order dated 24th Septemb .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... (ii) of the Act. It is propounded by the learned senior counsel that the basic purpose of the institution remains exclusively the scientific research and the rules and regulations are subordinate to the main object and can in no manner supplant the same. In essence, the proponement is that when the character of the institute does not change, the authority should not have refused to grant the recog .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d order. Such a laconic order cannot stand the nuanced scrutiny. It is obligatory on the part of the authorities to ascribe cogent reasons while dealing with the said applications as reason is heart and soul of an order. 5. In view of the aforesaid, we have no other option and are compelled to quash the order dated 24th September, 2010 contained in Annexure P-1 and accordingly we so do. We direct .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X