TMI Blog1999 (8) TMI 962X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e Act') is directed against an order dated 11th November, 1998 passed by the Trade Tax Tribunal, Lucknow whereby it dismissed the dealer's Second Appeal No. 165 of 1997 against an order dated 22nd October, 1997 passed by the Commissioner under Section 4-A (3) of the Act. 2. I have heard Sri Kunwar Saxena, learned Counsel for the revisionist and Sri B. K. Pandey, learned Standing Counsel ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... lso contended before the Commissioner that the dealer had no collected any tax on the sales by it during the period of exemption and, therefore, the tax levied or to be levied after the cancellation of the eligibility certificate be remitted in terms of a circular dated 24th May, 1994, This prayer was also rejected by the Commissioner. 5. Against the order dated 22nd October, 1997 passed by the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ibility certificate and such date may be prior to the date of such order. Therefore, the order rejecting the prayer for remission was not an order within the scope of Section 4-A (3) of the Act and no appeal could lie to the Tribunal under Section 10 of the Act. The Tribunal's order entertaining the said appeal in so for as it related to the question of remission of tax was without jurisdictio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|