TMI Blog2015 (12) TMI 934X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... eposit requirement on coming to know of the dismissal of its stay application. Copy of challans are filed. These show a deposit of ₹ 2,68,964/- . There is however no deposit of the interest and penalty components as assessed by the adjudication order dated 18.1.2010 and confirmed by the Appellate Commissioner dated 13.8.2010 while dismissing the appeal by the appellants herein - since an inc ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... weeks and report compliance on 17.10.2011. 2. By the order dated 17.10.2011, the appeal was dismissed for non-compliance of pre-deposit, as required under Section 35 F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. 3. Three years later, on 15.1.2014, the appellant has filed this ROA application claiming that it had no knowledge of a requirement of pre-deposit or of the order dated 1.8.2011 and stating to ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|