Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2007 (5) TMI 89

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... closure settlement owing to which NPC1L paid gross cancellation charges of Rs. 23.36 crores to the assessee and the deed of discharge was signed on 31-3-2000. The break up of the cancellation charges are as under :- (a) Investment in fixed assets Rs. 6.45 crores (b) Holiday compensation Rs. 9.30 crores (c) Insurance and bank charges Rs. 1.38 crores (d) Cancellation charges for SNP 3 to 6 and NP 9 pumps Rs. 6.23 crores Total Rs. 23.36 crores As per Revenue, it appeared that the cancellation charges received by the assessee from NPCIL was additional consideration and as such was required to be loaded in the assessable value of the 8 pumps. A show cause notice was is sued to the assessee seeking to add above compensation charges in the assessable value and demanding duty amounting to Rs. 3,73,76,000/- along with interest under Section 11AB of the Act. It also proposed to impose penalty under Rule 173Q of Central Excise Rules, 1944 read with Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2000 read with Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The show cause notic .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... lants for supply of 8 old designed pumps, out of 32 totals pump ordered earlier. New pumps were to be supplied at rate of Rs. 3 crores per pump as against Rs. 90 lakhs agreed to in the year 1990. The same were manufactured and cleared on payment of duty on agreed price. 1 4. It was submitted that the Commissioner has confirmed the demand by treating compensation charges received by them as additional consideration. While arriving at his finding, the Commissioner has held that investments in fixed assets, holiday compensation, insurance, bank charges and cancellation charges are essential ingredients as per established costing principles and ought to be included while valuing their 8 pumps. It was observed by him that there was continuity in the old orders and so-called new order was in fact a continuation of orders placed in 1990 and therefore the entire price received by him including liquidated damages should form part of the assessable value. He observed that the appellants have received technical know-how from M/s. KSB, Germany for the manufacture of impugned pumps and this technical know-how charges have to be treated as part of the assessable value. The contract entered .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... by the appellants. Since an en tire new facility was set up by the appellants and major part of the order was cancelled, this was a legitimate manner for determining damages. (b) Holiday Compensation - Rs. 10.68 crores - This amount was paid by NPCIL as liquidated damages in view of the non-utilization of the plant and as per the earlier agreements, the said amount was required to be recovered from NPCIL. This again a legitimate manner of computing damages. The plant was set up for the only client for nuclear coolant pumps. The said plant remained substantially idle for want of orders. The plant incurred expenses even if the same remained idle. (c) Cancellation charges - Rs. 6.23 crores, - This amount was paid as liquidated damages for loss of profit to the appellants. 6. In view of the above, it was submitted that liquidated and cancellation charges cannot be considered to be relating to the price of 8 pumps supplied by them. The Commissioner has failed to appreciate that the revised price of 8 pumps has gone up huge cost escalation from Rs. 7,23,10,000/- to Rs. 24, 21,00,000/- between 12-1-1990 to 24-10-2000 which itself showed that the appellants had charged NPCIL the f .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... umps for which the contract was made in 2000. Therefore it is evident from this fact that the agreement of 2000 has an intricate and unavoidable connection with the 3 earlier agreements. Even though the assessee had incurred expenses in creating infrastructure for manufacturing pumps in question and on payment of technical know-how fees, no pumps were supplied. It is also on record that the assessee was compensated for the investment as well as for other aspects like holiday compensation, insurance charges, amortization costs etc. Since investment on plant and machinery, amortized costs are essential ingredients for costing the product and since they form part of the compensation packages and not taken into account for the purpose of costing of the pumps they have to be treated as part and parcel of the final products. The fact that no design charges or technical know-hew fees for sale of 8 pumps has been taken into account, is evident from the annexure to purchase order of NPC dated 24-10-2000 where the cost of elements viz, design, preparation of drawings, documents, procedures, analysis, procurement of materials, manufacture, assembly, inspection testing, packing, documentation, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... alia it was agreed that the appellants would complete supply of 24 pump motor units of old design pumps already ordered under the agreement dated 6-8-1976. These 24 pumps were manufactured and supplied during the period 1985 to 1990 and cleared on payment of duty including duty on technical know-how charges. Therefore, the Commissioner's finding that there was no manufacture and supply of pumps nor any order placed before 1990 is incorrect as appellants have submitted documents to show that the orders were indeed placed and 24 pumps were supplied during the period 1985 to 1990. In view of this, conclusion drawn by the Commissioner that the expenditure incurred on creating infrastructure, technical know-how fees, drawings and designs fees, etc. are part of compensation, is wrong. The compensation has been paid as per terms of the agreement and the nature thereof has been explained. There is no finding from the Commissioner that the compensation arrived at was beyond the terms of agreement and that they were not provided for in the initial agreement entered into in 1976. It is because of the fact that no new technical know-how was acquired nor any fresh investment was made in creat .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates