9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (1) TMI 820X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e terms, whether this had the effect of depressing the sale price. The onus would be on the revenue. That being the thrust of the matter, liberty is granted to the revenue to produce the documents in this regard to discharge the onus. As we are remitting the matter, we may note one submission of the respondent-assessee. It is urged by the learned counsel that when the entire activities were within the knowledge of the excise authorities, penalty is not leviable. Needless to emphasize, the tribunal shall advert to the said submission, if required, in the ultimate eventuate, in proper perspective. In the result, the appeal is allowed, the order passed by the tribunal is set aside and the matter is remitted to the tribunal for fresh disposa ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... M/s. Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd. for the goods and it was giving 3-4% discount to the said Companies. 3. After the reply to the show cause was received, the adjudicating authority passed an order on 28th November, 2003, making a demand of ₹ 33,91,934,00/- under Section 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short the Act ) being the duty payable on the additional consideration received by the assessee from the customers in the form of notional interest accrued on advance payments and also imposed penalty for the same amount under Section 11AC of the Act. Apart from that, the adjudicating authority confirmed certain other demands. 4. Being grieved by the aforesaid order of the adjudicating authority, the respondent-as ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d their reflection in the Balance-sheet or the Annual Reports of the appellants, and the deployment of the funds so received by them, as I agree with the learned brother Shri Sekhon that onus to prove so is on the Revenue. However, the appellants would be at liberty to produce relevant evidences before the adjudicating authority in support of their contention that the interest accrued on such advances have not in any way resulted in depreciation of the price. All other issues are left open for the appellants to address before the adjudicating authority. 6. As there was difference of opinion, the matter was referred to the third Member and the third Member, who was a Judicial Member, vide order dated 29th August, 2007, cogitated on the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er Section 4(1)(a) proviso and, therefore, to that separate price charged from the Ponds (I) Limited, the extent of benefit obtained by the assessee on interest-free loan was required to be reloaded by hiking the price charged from M/s. Ponds (I) Limited to that extent. Contention 2 also, therefore, fails and is rejected. 10. In Hero Honda Motors Ltd. (supra), the question that arose for determination is whether receipt of advance and the income accruing thereon, had gone towards the depreciation of the sale price. In that context, the Court opined that there is conspectus of decisions which clearly establish that inclusion of notional interest in the assessable value or wholesale price will depend upon the facts of each case. The thr ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... da Motors Ltd. (supra). 12. Mr. Aarohi Bhalla, learned counsel for the respondent-assessee would submit that when no evidence was adduced by the revenue at any point of time and the law is settled that the onus is on the revenue to establish that there has been depression of assessable value, the majority view of the tribunal cannot be found fault with. 13. Mr. Yashank Adhyaru, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant-revenue would submit that the documents were produced before the adjudicating authority as well as the tribunal to show the nature of advance and the manner of transaction from which it is demonstrable that there has been depression of the assessable value. 14. On a perusal of the order passed by the Commiss ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ideration, not gratis, but by way of interest free advances. 15. In our considered opinion, in the present case, there has to be application of mind by the tribunal regard being had to the amount of money paid by purchasers, namely, M/s. Coca Cola India and M/s. Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd. and what is the effect of the sales made to the two companies in percentile terms, whether this had the effect of depressing the sale price. The onus would be on the revenue. That being the thrust of the matter, liberty is granted to the revenue to produce the documents in this regard to discharge the onus. As we are remitting the matter, we may note one submission of the respondent-assessee. It is urged by the learned counsel that when the entire ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
