9911796707
TMI Blog2014 (4) TMI 1116X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Tribunal has taken a similar view. Facts and issue being identical, we see no reason to take a contrary view than the view taken by the Coordinate Benches. Hence, we set aside the order of ld. CIT(A) and restore the same to the file of the AO to re-do the assessment afresh after hearing the assessee and considering all the material evidences as may be produced before him by the assessee. Needless ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... income of ₹ 5,43,500. The said assessment was set aside by the Commissioner of Income Tax u/s 263 of the Act vide order dated 28.3.2008. Subsequent to the directions of the CIT, the AO proceeded with the assessment and computed assessed income at ₹ 10,37,510/-. The additions were made on the basis of DDIT s report. Assessee carried the matter before the ld. CIT(A) but without any succ ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... merit in the contention of the ld. counsel for similar additions on similar facts, the Tribunal has set aside the issue back to the file of AO for de-novo assessment in the case of assessee s husband in ITA No.6573/Mum/2010 (supra). We also find that in another assessee of the same group in the case of Shri Akhtar Hussai Khan V/s ACIT in ITA No.6488/Mum/2010 (AY- 2003-04) dated 27.2.2013 Tribunal ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
