2016 (4) TMI 22

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Shri S K Shukla, AR ORDER Per P K Das The applicant filed this miscellaneous application for extension of period of stay granted vide Stay Order No.M/11518/2014, dt.24.03.2014. 2. The Larger Bench of the Tribunal in the case of M/s Haldiram India Pvt.Ltd. & others Vs Commissioner, Central Excise & Service Tax - 2014-TIOL-1965-CESTAT-DEL-LB, held that the Stay Order-passed by the Tribunal may .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d in any protractive strategies, extension of stay could be granted (beyond the period of 365 days) by passing a speaking order disclosing the satisfaction of the Tribunal as to absence of any delay/protractive stratagems by the appellant/assessee resulting in non disposal' of the appeal or that the appeal could not be disposed of on account or pendency of several appeals of other reasons attr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ructure and organizational limitations of CESTAT. 21. The reference is answered as above. All the present applications/ appeals shall be listed before the appropriate Bench having the roster, for disposal on merits." 3. None appeared for the applicant. It is seen from the records that the appeal was not taken up for hearing after passing of the Stay Order. 4. On the other hand, the learned Aut .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X