TMI Blog2005 (5) TMI 645X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nue has challenged the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) wherein he has observed as follows:- I, am, therefore, of the view that the divisional Officer should have accepted the accounts maintained in prescribed Form-V register and examine the claim of the appellant on the basis of that account and such additional account/information submitted by the appellant to faciliate broad co-relation ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... bmits that in the case of Commr. of Central Excise, Ahmedabad-I Vs. Medico Labs. Reported in 2004 (173) E.L.T. 117 (Gujarat) has held that: Commissioner (Appeals) continues to have power of remand even after amendment of Section 35A (3) of Central Excise Act, 1944 by Finance Act, 2001 w.e.f. 11/5/2001. This is based on Hon'ble Supreme Court decisions in case of U.O.I. Vs. Umesh Dhaimode rep ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|