2015 (10) TMI 2491

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t : Shri S.J. Vyas, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri Alok Srivastava, Authorised Representative JUDGEMENT Per : Mr. P.K. Das; The applicant filed these applications for early hearing of the appeals. The learned Advocate submits that the issue involved in these appeals is covered by the decision of the Tribunal in the appellant's own case. Hence, the appeals are taken up for hearing upon the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ries Limited vs. CCE, Raigad  2007 (209) ELT 185 (Tri. LB). The learned Advocate submits that, in the appellants own case, for the earlier period, the Tribunal vide Order No. A/11232/2015 dated 24.08.2015 allowed the appeal. 3. On the other hand, the learned Authorised Representative for the Revenue reiterates the findings of the adjudicating authority. He submits that there is no finding of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e matter as there is no clarity in the findings of the adjudicating authority. We are of the considered view that the matter is required to be remanded back to the adjudicating authority to decide afresh. At this stage, the learned Advocate submits that the part of the demand is after the amendment of Rule 8 of the Valuation Rules and therefore, they are liable to pay duty after the amendment. As .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X