TMI Blog2007 (11) TMI 66X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... case, impugned order of no clandestine removal is upheld - CEA No 66 of 2007 - - - Dated:- 12-11-2007 - IN THE M.M. Kumar and Ajay Kumar Mittal JJ. [Order per : M.M. Kumar, J.]- The instant appeal has been filed by the revenue under Section 35 (G) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 challenging the order dated 29.11.2006 (P-5) passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ot put to difficulty to make payment of duty twice. The Tribunal has further found that the provisions of Rule 173Q (1)(a) to (c) were neither attracted to the present case nor any show cause notice with specific violation was issued to the assessee-respondent. The show cause notice has been held to be vague because the provisions of Rule 173Q of the Rules shall be applicable if there is wholesome ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|