TMI Blog2006 (10) TMI 85X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 06 - - - Dated:- 16-10-2006 - JUDGMENT 1. Heard Mr. Andhyarujina in support of this petition. Mr. Sharma appears for the respondents. 2. The premises being Office Nos.101 and 106 situated in Persepolis Premises at Vashi, Navi Mumbai are the subject matter of this petition. One Mr. K.N. Marathe who was earlier Director of Emar Hotels is in tax arrears. This hotel is stated to be owning ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... llenge this order. However, what we notice is that as against the rejection of this objection, remedy by way of filing a suit is available under clause (6) of the above-referred Rule 11. This sub-clause (6) reads as follows : "Where a claim or an objection is preferred, the party against whom an order is made may institute a suit in civil court to establish the right which he claims to the prope ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|